[00:14:22] *** Quits: guerby (~guerby@april/board/guerby) (Quit: Leaving) [00:19:21] *** Joins: guerby (~guerby@april/board/guerby) [01:51:13] *** Quits: Shuhei (caf6fc61@gateway/web/freenode/ip.202.246.252.97) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) [03:17:30] bwalker sorry, forgot to reply yesterday. I already informed pawelkax of this, thanks! [04:28:14] *** Joins: davidsha (davidsha@nat/intel/x-tbuyfpsndwtfrmct) [07:59:34] FYI comm meeting now [09:23:23] *** Quits: davidsha (davidsha@nat/intel/x-tbuyfpsndwtfrmct) (Remote host closed the connection) [09:50:41] spdk.io says there's an Asia-friendly github issue review meeting tomorrow [09:51:00] sorry, February 7, that's two days from now [09:51:16] isn't that cancelled? [09:51:27] due to the Chinese New Year [09:52:33] I think we only have the U.S. holiday exception list in there [10:09:09] exit [10:09:33] Sorry, wrong window [10:33:54] *** Joins: travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-54-163-166-160.compute-1.amazonaws.com) [10:33:55] (spdk/master) bdevperf: fix -S in usage message (Jim Harris) [10:33:55] Diff URL: https://github.com/spdk/spdk/compare/2446c5c6f3f4...d593193fd372 [10:33:55] *** Parts: travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-54-163-166-160.compute-1.amazonaws.com) () [10:51:26] *** Quits: lhodev (~lhodev@66-90-218-190.dyn.grandenetworks.net) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) [11:07:05] *** Joins: lhodev (~lhodev@66-90-218-190.dyn.grandenetworks.net) [11:09:27] *** Joins: travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-54-211-45-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com) [11:09:28] (spdk/master) test/common: Added spdk_ring_count mock (Wojciech Malikowski) [11:09:28] Diff URL: https://github.com/spdk/spdk/compare/d593193fd372...eccf549159ca [11:09:28] *** Parts: travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-54-211-45-123.compute-1.amazonaws.com) () [11:10:59] *** Joins: travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-54-166-225-109.compute-1.amazonaws.com) [11:11:00] (spdk/master) setup.sh: enhance output from setup, reset and status (Pawel Wodkowski) [11:11:00] Diff URL: https://github.com/spdk/spdk/compare/eccf549159ca...768cc8ee2e56 [11:11:00] *** Parts: travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-54-166-225-109.compute-1.amazonaws.com) () [11:12:25] *** Joins: travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-54-91-235-36.compute-1.amazonaws.com) [11:12:26] (spdk/master) scripts/rpc: allow server address to be a relative path (Karol Latecki) [11:12:26] Diff URL: https://github.com/spdk/spdk/compare/768cc8ee2e56...5632ec91904a [11:12:26] *** Parts: travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-54-91-235-36.compute-1.amazonaws.com) () [11:21:29] jimharris, thanks for reviewing the crypto mem leak patch, I updated the commit message and put a comment in there on how the patch should be viewed, I guess it doesn't matter how I fixed it in patch 1 vs 2, etc., just the last vs base. https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/442896 [11:50:36] What do y'all think of a new GitHub issue label "CI" or "Infra" or something? I just entered 2 new ones - would be good I think to quickly view them as infra as opposed to code... [12:14:39] a new issue label would be good - but I think there's a significant difference between the two issues you just submitted [12:15:07] the QoS one is possibly (even probably) something that needs to be fixed in the code or at least the test script [12:15:15] but the other one is the CI setup itself [12:15:54] peluse: i just responded on the crypto mem leak patch - i was hoping to split out the code movement from the code refactoring [12:16:04] well, yeah didn't mean to imply the QOS thing was CI related even though that's exactly what I did :) [12:16:23] jimharris, yup saw that. Will see what I can do ;) [12:16:40] but maybe we have two labels - one for CI Infrastructure, another for Intermittent CI Failures [12:17:03] and then maybe an issue moves from one label to the other once we get more info? [12:17:24] but i totally agree - it would be nice to differentiate some of these [13:28:56] cool, done [14:40:54] *** Quits: gila (~gila@85.159.237.67) (Quit: My Mac Pro has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…) [15:24:42] *** Joins: Shuhei (caf6fc61@gateway/web/freenode/ip.202.246.252.97) [15:30:06] Hi, I don't know why I can't see ISA-L code in lib/util/crc32.c in github and the master branch I pulled from github. [15:30:58] I saw the commit log by git log --oneline locally as same as in github. [15:32:34] *** Joins: travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-54-242-185-53.compute-1.amazonaws.com) [15:32:35] (spdk/master) configure: update how CPU arch is determined (gila) [15:32:35] Diff URL: https://github.com/spdk/spdk/compare/5632ec91904a...8629d8da6644 [15:32:35] *** Parts: travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-54-242-185-53.compute-1.amazonaws.com) () [15:35:20] I held the patch integrating ISA-L CRC16 locally and will post it today, and noticed this odd state. [16:55:19] hi Shuhei - I think the change is in crc32c.c (not crc32.c) [18:28:33] *** Quits: Shuhei (caf6fc61@gateway/web/freenode/ip.202.246.252.97) (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)